Jul. 1, 2010

The SmartSynch Oxford Endurance Weekend

by Campbell McCool

We’re thrilled to announce our sponsorship of The SmartSynch Oxford Endurance Weekend, taking place August 13-15, 2010 in Oxford, Mississippi.

This sponsorship is very special for us—many of us on the SmartSynch team graduated from The University of Mississippi and live in Oxford, and this allows us an opportunity to contribute to the community through these great events.

Here is the line-up of events:

  • Friday night (August 13th): Rowan Oak 5k & event kick-off party at the University Museum
  • Three Saturday events (August 14th): the Tri-Oxford Triathalon, the Plein Air Classic Bike Race in Taylor, Misssissippi, and the Race of Truth Time Trial
  • Sunday event wrap-up (August 15th): Oxford Square Criterium

Other event sponsors include the University of Mississippi Museum & Historic Houses, Plein Air, The Downtown Inn & Suites, Chick-fil-A, the Hampton Inn, Active Oxford, Oxford Bicycle Company, Oxford Cycling Club, and Mercury Bicycle Company.

You can find more information on how to register for the SmartSynch Oxford Endurance Weekend here. We look forward to seeing you at the races!

Bookmark and Share

Jun. 23, 2010

Choosing the Right Security for the Smart Grid

by Dr. Simon Blake-Wilson

Post from SmartSynch’s publication, The Truth, by Dr. Simon Blake-Wilson, VP, Embedded Security Solutions, AuthenTec, Inc.

Security is a hot topic for the smart grid market—generating consumer, government and industry concerns about the safety of digitizing the electric grid. This article examines how public wireless smart grid projects are integrating best-of-breed security protocols to ensure the highest level of safety for the grid, while limiting management complexity. This article will also discuss how IPsec, secure platform technology and public key infrastructure (PKI), the same layer of security used by governments and financial institutions, will provide utilities and businesses with a future-proof, industry-proven, secure smart grid solution that can quickly be taken to market while reducing costs.

There is a dramatic push in the deployment of smart grid solutions, fueled by concerns like cost-reduction, energy efficiency, and energy independence. Frequently, many trials and early deployments are taking place without security considerations. Unfortunately, security is not an afterthought and something that can be added on at a later stage—good, robust security has to be integrated right from the start.

Without adequate security measures, utilities are vulnerable to fraud, service theft and process interruption (possibly leading to equipment damage and personal injury), affecting consumers facing unexpected service interruption and loss of consumption data privacy. Utilities are exposed to liability claims if they are not protecting the consumer’s privacy in compliance with various international laws.

The vulnerability of the smart grid infrastructure to cyber-attacks is expected to drive a boom in cyber-security spending for utilities. According to a February 2010 report from Pike Research, the smart grid cyber security sector will increase from $1.2 billion in 2009 to $3.7 billion by 2015.  During the period from 2010 to 2015, the research firm anticipates that a total of approximately $21 billion will be invested in global smart grid cyber security deployments.

Focus on Utilities

Securing a brand new infrastructure that plugs into an existing infrastructure, as is the case with the smart grid, is a tremendous task. Fortunately, there is plenty that can be learned from securing IT networks. The security services that need to be provided in an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) are exactly the same as the ones provided by Virtual Private Networks (VPN)—data confidentiality and privacy, data integrity, service availability, authentication and authorization of communicating entities, livelihood, secure firmware upgrades as well as defense against sophisticated attacks like man-in-the-middle, replay, and reflection attacks.

Solutions that provide these security services exist today, but they have to be adapted to smart grid architectures. When making a choice, it is important for utilities to realize that good security solutions need to be open and proven (note that, from a business case point of view, they also need to be future-proof and scalable). Open solutions are better than secret or proprietary solutions because they have been thoroughly tested by academia and hackers, and have withstood them successfully. It is an illusion to think that secret systems can remain secret for long—there is a consensus among the security community that security through obscurity is bound to fail. Secondly, when making a choice, it is always advisable to go for the proven solution. That’s because these systems have been studied, tested, and deployed so many times that the risk of a hidden security flaw (possibly leading to a security exposure) is much lower than with new, unproven, and insufficiently tested systems.Such proven technologies and solutions include VPN solutions, Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) solutions, and secure platform technology.

As a logical conclusion, the best way for utilities to manage risk is to rely on proven solutions from proven vendors. Even when working with trusted solutions, utilities should not forget to take an overall approach to risk management, encompassing implementation, deployment and operation, with continuous testing and improvement at every stage.

Using Public Wireless Networks

Intuitively, one may be tempted to think that private networks need to be less secured than public networks, because attackers cannot easily access them. Examples of private networks include telecommunication operators’ core networks or campus networks owned by big enterprises. However, history shows that a determined attacker will gain access, regardless of the network’s nature. This is even more so when using private networks for the smart grid, because the connected endpoints are in people’s homes, and
therefore accessible to attackers.

Although using private networks seems to be a compelling option, it will not significantly improve the security level. In addition, from a scalability point of view (the need to connect an increasing number of endpoints per household), low bandwidth private networks are less suitable for AMI deployments. This makes the low-cost public IP network, with its high available bandwidth and its proven and trusted security solutions, a better candidate for AMI deployments.

AuthenTec’s Security/Encryption & SmartSynch’s Solutions

The first steps in a secure AMI are the ability to identify connected devices, to authenticate these devices (i.e., to verify that these devices are really the devices they claim to be) and to authorize these devices (i.e., allowing them access to the network based on the authentication results and the utility’s security policy). This challenge is similar to the one encountered in services and applications like e-commerce, pay TV, defense systems, and banking applications. The solution of choice that provides this identification and authentication service is the Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). A PKI is an infrastructure (i.e., the whole of organizations, people, equipment, software and protocols) that is capable of issuing revocable certificates (or digital identities), and verifying the validity of these certificates.

Certificates are the credentials of a meter, or of any other connected device (electric cars and batteries, solar panels, windmills and smart home appliances that can take advantage of cheaper time-of-use-based billing services). They are more secure, more scalable, and easier to manage versus using symmetric keys as a credential. Certificates are issued by trusted entities called Certificate Authorities (CA). A utility may choose to take on the role of a CA, but it can also outsource this task. Certificates are generated by high-security appliances called Hardware Security Modules (HSM), which are capable of injecting digital certificates during the manufacturing process without human intervention (and thus without security risk).

The second step in a secure AMI is secure communication. When using a public IP network, the traditional, tested solution of choice is IPsec. This communication security protocol provides all desired security services—data confidentiality and privacy, data integrity, certificate-based (or other) authentication, livelihood, and defense against man-in-the-middle, replay, and reflection attacks.

A third cornerstone for building secure smart grid solutions—especially when deploying scalable and future-proof home gateway based architectures—is secure platform technology. Secure platform refers to the ability to detect and defend against attacks. A secure platform will always control its system firmware to check if the software is original or an authorized update. This is called secure boot. Optionally, a secure platform can also check its system software integrity at runtime, called runtime integrity checking. Secure platforms also offer secure storage services (sensitive data are always encrypted when stored) and defend against attacks such as rollback (returning to an old version of the system software to exploit a known security flaw that has been patched in more recent versions) and cloning (cloning of compromised or hacked software on other devices). Finally, secure platforms enable secure firmware upgrades, and, optionally, they enforce application separation, to avoid an application accessing and potentially tampering with sensitive data of another application. AuthenTec’s technology has been successfully deployed by leading vendors to create secure platforms in consumer devices such as smartphones.

Smart grid security needs to be addressed.  SmartSynch and AuthenTec are leading the charge to provide open, widely tested and approved security solutions based on PKI, secure communications, and trusted platform technology. Public wireless networks, when secured using AuthenTec’s security solutions, are as secure as private networks and cost less to maintain. Utilities can mitigate security risks by proactively implementing these best-in-breed, secure solutions.

Bookmark and Share

Jun. 14, 2010

Why Cellular Will Win The Smart Grid War: An Energy Central / SmartSynch Webinar

by Campbell McCool

Last Wednesday we had the privilege of hosting an Energy Central webinar titled ‘Why Cellular Will Win the Smart Grid War’. This topic drew nearly 800 registrants, which is a clear testament of just how important the argument over which network model is best suited for the smart grid truly is. Participants and listeners consisted of utility reps from all over the world, tech companies, regulators and government officials, and even SmartSynch competitors.

As many of you know, a little over a month ago a major US utility announced their decision to deploy several hundred thousand smartmeters through existing cellular networks– a move that represented the first mass deployment of smartmeters using cellular technology. We want to thank Energy Central for giving us the opportunity to join together and discuss cellular technology and smart grid on the heels of this important milestone.

Our CEO, Stephen Johnston led the webinar, which can be viewed here. Additionally, you can view the live Twitter Stream webinar coverage from our @SmartSynch Twitter account here.

Last, we strongly encourage you to continue the cellular / smart grid conversation by submitting your questions or comments below.

Bookmark and Share

Jun. 10, 2010

Cellular and the Smart Grid: A Conversation with Greentech Media

by Campbell McCool

Recently, I was fortunate to have the opportunity to speak with Greentech Media at their Networked Grid Conference on the topic of cellular networks and the smart grid.

We spoke about the general shift in attitude from utilities towards utilizing cellular networks for smart grid applications—a shift that is largely attributed to convenience, ease of use and increasingly competitive costs of smart meter deployment.

Another key takeaway from our conversation was that SmartSynch’s cellular carrier model appeals not only to large, investor owned utilities, but also to city utilities such as the City of Griffin, GA, where we recently deployed 16,000 meters.

As utilities become increasingly open to leveraging cellular technology, existing networks such as AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon are recognizing the revenue opportunities that smart grid presents.

You can hear more details on cellular technology and smart grid in the video below:

As always, we welcome your questions and comments on these topics.

Bookmark and Share

Jun. 9, 2010

SmartSynch CEO Stephen Johnston: “Public Wireless Networks Will Drive the Smart Grid”

by Campbell McCool

image from greentechmedia.com

The debate around whether utilities should adopt public wireless or private networks for the smart grid has been a hot topic – leading to strong words on both sides (see “scourge of the industry” remark below). Recently, it hit a breaking point. At The Networked Grid, hosted by Greentech Media, our CEO Stephen Johnston delivered a keynote and took the gloves off to question the value of private networks and prove why commercial public wireless networks (like those from AT&T, Verizon, T‐Mobile and Sprint – which partner with SmartSynch) provide better coverage, bandwidth, cost savings, scalability, reliability and security for the smart grid.

Stephen noted that many smart grid networks operate in an unlicensed spectrum – the same spectrum used for cordless phones—but they are often slow compared to commercial or broadband networks. Utilities have historically supported an economic model based on the philosophy of “build, own, control and manage your own network,” but SmartSynch is focused on turning that aged paradigm on its head by advocating a digital cellular network strategy – which leverages the networks operated by the world’s most successful telecommunications companies. Since these networks already exist, they blow proprietary networks (which will inevitably require costly technology upgrades and equipment replacements) out of the water. Using public wireless networks now cost utilities dramatically less than the “build, own, control and manage your own network” model they have come to accept.

Yes, we’ve always touted the benefits of using public wireless networks to facilitate two‐way communications of smart grid data, but the market is rapidly changing and major telecommunications companies are seeking a bigger piece of the smart grid pie as it provides a new revenue opportunity.

Catching some audience members by surprise, Stephen cast a shadow of doubt on the long‐revered proprietary networks – highlighting four main areas where public wireless networks reign supreme: coverage, bandwidth, security, and cost.

Coverage: By leveraging a commercial network strategy, utilities can effectively implement a multi‐network solution in its service territory – so even if one carrier doesn’t work, another can be used. It has been proven that commercial network carriers combined cover more than 97 percent of America’s population – and that is with voice – not the data network that transmits at a higher wattage with a more powerful antenna. If our recent news with TNMP announcing a 10,000‐unit residential SmartMeter trial deployment with an unprecedented 99.96 percent average daily read rate is any indication, public wireless networks deliver successful smart grid rollouts without coverage issues.

Bandwidth: When a utility uses a commercial carrier for their smart grid network, the data being transmitted is not being interspersed with texts messages and phone calls, but rather through a dedicated network channel (which is like a private network already built‐out). As the network speed improves – and moves to 4G and beyond –smart grid networks reap the benefits by allowing utilities to deploy the latest and greatest technology available at any given time – without investing in any additional network equipment.

Security: Commercial network providers spend billions of dollars annually to maintain secure networks – and the same layer of fortification being used to secure SmartSynch’s smart grid devices is protecting the millions of daily financial transactions, military data transmissions and even the e‐mail on Obama’s Blackberry. The level of security being deployed by the commercial carriers far exceeds NIST requirements and is constantly improving as the ecosystem of vendors supporting the billions of devices on commercial carrier networks continually enhance security protocols.

Cost: Until recently, a utility could not afford to use a commercial wireless carrier network as its primary network for the smart grid as it was too expensive to install a high‐speed, IP‐addressable endpoint for residential smart metering at every home. However, within the last few months, we’ve proven that assumption is no longer valid. As T‐Mobile’s John Horn said at our SmartSynch conference last month, it is less expensive for a utility to leverage a commercial network for its smart grid rollout than building, owning, controlling and managing its own proprietary network.

Now that public wireless network technology has become cost competitive, it’s hard to envision a utility choosing a more complex, costly and proprietary alternative. Even Linda Jackman, group vice president, product strategy & management, Oracle Utilities (who also keynoted at The Networked Grid) took a stance against private networks, saying, “You who are developing proprietary models/languages [for the smart grid network] are the scourge of our industry.” The advantages of using public wireless smart metering technology are becoming indisputable – and as SmartSynch continues to rollout news announcements about utilities deploying its smart grid solutions on these networks – that message will continue to resonate in the market.

We’ll post video of Stephen’s keynote once it’s available from Greentech Media, and continue the public wireless conversation with coverage of Stephen Johnston’s Energy Central webinar titled ‘Why Public Wireless (Cellular) Will Win the Smart Grid War.’ (You can register for the event here.) And now over to you: do you think utilities will favor public wireless networks in lieu of private network build‐outs for the smart grid?

Bookmark and Share